Robin Hood
Jun. 21st, 2009 03:56 pmRobin Hood is either getting worse, or failing in its attempts to do interesting things with the characters. Because Isabella has such great potential, but she's so flat. With her being the big evil from here on in (dear Prince John having retreated to London), it's going to take some major re-jiging of the plot, because she just doesn't chew scenery as well as PJ or the Sheriff.
Also, interestingly, events of the last episode have moved Guisburne towards what he could have been at the end of last series. Even if the basic moral of the story appears to be Guisburne can never be happy. I think they've done the right thing giving him all the major dramatics because Jonas Armstrong cannot do the major dramatics, but he can do light and fluffy.
By the by, Robin, stealing your best friend's girl is wrong. And Kate, how could you! (She asked Much to tell Robin it was okay for Robin to go out with her, knowing that Much adores her.) Much then tries to run away from home, all very Gromit in the Wrong Trousers, and ends up saving the day. What on Earth do you see in Robin, Kate?
Other than that, Robert Pugh acted his socks off, Toby Stephens appears to enjoy playing a pantomime villain, the Archbishop of Canterbury is made of awesome and Thorton is a suitably nasty piece of work.
They seem to have stuffed a lot into the last two episodes, if only to allow Isabella to make her three allignment turns per episode (seriously, it's like Stephanie McMahon but more so).
( Why Isabella should be an interesting character )
We're still left with at least 4 sides to every plot (Robin's, Guy's, Isabella's, PJ's and possible the villain of week) which tends to lead to over-complication.
Also, if there's a sillier scene than Guisburne infiltrating the church on TV this year, I will be deeply shocked.
Also, interestingly, events of the last episode have moved Guisburne towards what he could have been at the end of last series. Even if the basic moral of the story appears to be Guisburne can never be happy. I think they've done the right thing giving him all the major dramatics because Jonas Armstrong cannot do the major dramatics, but he can do light and fluffy.
By the by, Robin, stealing your best friend's girl is wrong. And Kate, how could you! (She asked Much to tell Robin it was okay for Robin to go out with her, knowing that Much adores her.) Much then tries to run away from home, all very Gromit in the Wrong Trousers, and ends up saving the day. What on Earth do you see in Robin, Kate?
Other than that, Robert Pugh acted his socks off, Toby Stephens appears to enjoy playing a pantomime villain, the Archbishop of Canterbury is made of awesome and Thorton is a suitably nasty piece of work.
They seem to have stuffed a lot into the last two episodes, if only to allow Isabella to make her three allignment turns per episode (seriously, it's like Stephanie McMahon but more so).
( Why Isabella should be an interesting character )
We're still left with at least 4 sides to every plot (Robin's, Guy's, Isabella's, PJ's and possible the villain of week) which tends to lead to over-complication.
Also, if there's a sillier scene than Guisburne infiltrating the church on TV this year, I will be deeply shocked.