![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)

I suppose I should have warned about half-naked Russian Presidents, but that reaction is what I was on about. Because after the initial reaction of what the hell, you go 'for a man of 55, he's in decent shape'.
So the why comes into play, because can you imagine any other politician trying the macho fishing routine? And get away with it?
I mean Gordon Brown has too much sense to try it, ditto Ming Campbell (who would probably be the only other one who could get away with it).
I can only imagine Tony Blair trying it, trying to charm the fish into submission, while George Dubya would find some way of looking even more foolish that usual doing it, and if David 'Call Me Dave' Cameron did it, you'd be looking over his shoulder to see the man who'd put the fly on his line for him.
My main reason of interest in the photo is the UK press's reaction to it, which was mostly to laugh, because what was the Russian President doing looking so silly, and why are the Russian public falling for it (I have no idea if they are by the way, and I don't trust the British press when they say they are).
Because apparently it does. So the question becomes why, to the journalists does it look silly?
Is it a politician outside of his normal environment, outside of his normal clothes? A comedian somewhere along the line said that a lot of comedy is the interpolation of two things that should not go together.
If that is the case, it leads to a question - what on Earth do journalists want? They complain when politicians wear suits, they complain when they don't. It's really quite unfair.
no subject
Date: 2007-08-26 11:09 pm (UTC)