Withdrawals from the 2025 Tour de France
Jul. 30th, 2025 10:42 pmSadly, this year, I haven't been able to watch any of the Tour.
Yes, this is entirely due to my cousin refusing to let me put it on the TV at the weekend and RL bad thing meaning I didn't have the time to watch the highlights at lunchtime.
However, I did find the time to do the withdrawal stats.
Looking at the Kaplan Meier charts.

While I was compiling the chart, I did start to wonder whether this was an exceptionally kind year in terms of attrition (if you're not Jasper Philipsen or Filippo Ganna, my poor Nutella child). I will try and borrow a copy of Prism to get the numbers but the comparison itself makes it clear that there was less attrition than normal but not by much.

I don't know whether that's because the first "week" this year was 10 days long, because the 14th of July fell on a Monday (very necessary Casablanca clip here - https://youtu.be/HM-E2H1ChJM?si=Sadu7MugvhdwDhXC).

23 teams took part in the race.
The withdrawals seem reasonably balanced.
6 teams had 2 riders withdraw - Soudal QuickStep, Total Energies, Lotto, Alpecin-Deceunnick, Ineos Grenadiers and XDS Astana.
5 teams had no one withdraw - Arkea - B&B Hotels, Israel Premier Tech, Picnic Post NL, Tudor and Visma - Lease A Bike.
(And I know it's because sponsorship is hard to find, but do the team names need to be that long).
Because they withdrawals are evenly spread, in the Kaplan Meier diagram split by teams, there's no sudden drops. It looks very like a plait.

Further evidence of it being an unusually non-attritional race, despite them having a stage with a sprint finish up the Ventoux - https://velo.outsideonline.com/road/road-racing/tour-de-france/highlights-tour-de-france-stage-16-2025, is that no one stage stands out as having more withdrawals.

Looking at withdrawals by type by week:



Ignoring that week 1 was 10 days ... the really interesting things are:
1 - No over the time limit withdrawals at all
2 - The pattern is almost symmetrical
The number of withdrawals by type is pretty even, 48% were mid-stage abandonments, 52% were did not starts.



Since Did Not Start withdrawals are mostly "help, the damage has caught up with me" withdrawals, that pattern makes sense.
Yes, this is entirely due to my cousin refusing to let me put it on the TV at the weekend and RL bad thing meaning I didn't have the time to watch the highlights at lunchtime.
However, I did find the time to do the withdrawal stats.
Looking at the Kaplan Meier charts.

While I was compiling the chart, I did start to wonder whether this was an exceptionally kind year in terms of attrition (if you're not Jasper Philipsen or Filippo Ganna, my poor Nutella child). I will try and borrow a copy of Prism to get the numbers but the comparison itself makes it clear that there was less attrition than normal but not by much.

I don't know whether that's because the first "week" this year was 10 days long, because the 14th of July fell on a Monday (very necessary Casablanca clip here - https://youtu.be/HM-E2H1ChJM?si=Sadu7MugvhdwDhXC).

23 teams took part in the race.
The withdrawals seem reasonably balanced.
6 teams had 2 riders withdraw - Soudal QuickStep, Total Energies, Lotto, Alpecin-Deceunnick, Ineos Grenadiers and XDS Astana.
5 teams had no one withdraw - Arkea - B&B Hotels, Israel Premier Tech, Picnic Post NL, Tudor and Visma - Lease A Bike.
(And I know it's because sponsorship is hard to find, but do the team names need to be that long).
Because they withdrawals are evenly spread, in the Kaplan Meier diagram split by teams, there's no sudden drops. It looks very like a plait.

Further evidence of it being an unusually non-attritional race, despite them having a stage with a sprint finish up the Ventoux - https://velo.outsideonline.com/road/road-racing/tour-de-france/highlights-tour-de-france-stage-16-2025, is that no one stage stands out as having more withdrawals.

Looking at withdrawals by type by week:



Ignoring that week 1 was 10 days ... the really interesting things are:
1 - No over the time limit withdrawals at all
2 - The pattern is almost symmetrical
The number of withdrawals by type is pretty even, 48% were mid-stage abandonments, 52% were did not starts.



Since Did Not Start withdrawals are mostly "help, the damage has caught up with me" withdrawals, that pattern makes sense.