redfiona99 (![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
redfiona99) wrote2012-12-11 04:21 pm
redfiona99) wrote2012-12-11 04:21 pm
Star Trek Trailer
Mostly I am meh.
Let's be honest here, Cumberbund does not have the voice to do growly. Dear JJ et al., he can do plenty evil without growling.
Secondly
No, just no. At least 9/10ths of the punch of Wrath of Khan comes from having known those characters for years. You can't recapture that in two films. And killing off McCoy would also not work.
And if they're pretending this isn't a Khan re-hash, why are they making it look like one? Lying to your audience is not good. And unfortunately I have seen too many action movies to be impressed by generic stuff blowing up.
Let's be honest here, Cumberbund does not have the voice to do growly. Dear JJ et al., he can do plenty evil without growling.
Secondly
No, just no. At least 9/10ths of the punch of Wrath of Khan comes from having known those characters for years. You can't recapture that in two films. And killing off McCoy would also not work.
And if they're pretending this isn't a Khan re-hash, why are they making it look like one? Lying to your audience is not good. And unfortunately I have seen too many action movies to be impressed by generic stuff blowing up.
no subject
Mickie looks awesome.
That's always going to be Daniels and AJ's problem, they've got so much to top. But at the same time, they don't really have bad matches. But yes, the ending. And Daniels's face at the end. To misquote Pirates of the Caribbean, there'll be no living with him now.
It's not that I dislike Hardy, it's that I like Bobby Roode, or rather, I think he's an exceptionally good heel. (Plus he needs to be champion when James Storm finally gets the belt again. Because vengeance will only be complete then.) Also, they had yet another screwy ending.